Skip to main content

Who are guardians and what does guardianship entail?

Guardianship is a parental right and responsibility that a biological parent has with regards to his/her child.  It is, amongst others, set out in Section 18 of the Children’s Act, 38 of 2005 (“the Act”).  What is important to note here, is that a person can also be awarded guardianship over a child other than his/her own, by the high court of competent jurisdiction.
In South Africa, a child becomes an adult when he/she turns 18.  Prior to that date, the person/s who have full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of that child, and in particular guardianship, must make legal decisions on the child’s behalf.  So, in other words, guardianship is the right and responsibility to make legal decisions for your child or for the child for which you have been appointed as guardian. 
 A biological mother, whether married or unmarried, automatically has full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of her child.  But, if the mother of a child is a minor herself (younger than 18) and the father of the child does not have guardianship in respect of the child (because he is an unmarried father and he does not comply with the requirements in terms of Section 21 of the Act), then the guardian of the child’s biological mother is also the guardian of the child. 
A married biological father of a child automatically has full parental responsibilities and rights – which include guardianship – in respect of his child. In as far as an unmarried father is concerned; he must first comply with the requirements set out in Section 21 of the Act before he acquires full parental responsibilities and rights.
What does guardianship mean?
Guardianship is a parent’s responsibility and right to:
-        protect the child’s interests in as far as the child’s property is concerned;
-        assist the child in legal matters (for example: to represent the child in contractual matters or litigation);
-        Give or refuse consent as required by law by all the parties who have guardianship of the child, in respect of:
o   the child’s marriage;
o   the child’s adoption;
o   the child’s removal or departure from the Republic of South Africa;
o   the child’s application for a passport;
o   the alienation or encumbrance of the child’s immovable property.
Can I nominate another person in my Will to act as my child’s guardian?
A person may nominate someone as the guardian of his/her minor child upon his/her death.   However, please take note that divorced parents retain their joint (full) parental responsibilities and rights in respect of their children.  Therefore, upon each other’s death, the surviving parent will automatically obtain care for the child and become the sole guardian of the child. 
If the deceased parent has nominated someone else in his/her Will as guardian of his/her child, then the surviving parent will have to agree to share his/her parental responsibilities and rights with that person, before the provisions of the Will can take effect.  If the surviving parent does not agree to this, the person may apply to the High Court for an order which will allow him/her to be appointed as the child’s guardian provided that he/she has good reasons for doing so.
Conclusion
From the above, it is clear that being a guardian is a huge responsibility and one that should not be taken lightly.  In order to act as a child’s guardian, it is required from a parent, or guardian, to know and understand the legal implications of their actionsbecause the same will have a direct impact on the child’s interests.  Also, importantly, a guardian can be held liable for the mismanagement of a child’s funds, property or assets.
Written by Talita Erasmus – a practising attorney at Alan José Incorporated.

Contact us for more information regarding care, contact and guardianship of a minor child.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Partners in a permanent life partnership could now enjoy the same benefits as spouses when it comes to intestate succession.

  The High Court in Cape Town recently decided a matter where a surviving partner, in a permanent life partnership, sought to declare certain sections of the Intestate Succession Act 18 of 1987 and Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act 27 1990 unconstitutional.   In Bwanya v Master of the High Court and others 2020 (12) BCLR 1446 (WCC) the Applicant alleged that she and the deceased had been partners in a permanent opposite-sex life partnership, with the same or similar characteristics as a marriage, in which they had undertaken reciprocal duties of support and had committed themselves to marrying each other.  The deceased passed without leaving a valid will. The Applicant accordingly claimed against the estate and sought to be recognized as an heir in terms of the Intestate Succession Act. She further also sought maintenance from the estate in terms of the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act.   The executor rejected the Applicants claims on the basis that the aforementioned acts does

THE EFFECT OF YOUR MARITAL REGIME ON TRANSACTIONS WITH THIRD PARTIES

Court cases discussed in this article: -        Broodie N.O. v Maposa and Others 2018 (3) SA 129 (WCC) [The court of first instance] & -        Marais N.O. and Another v Maposa and Others (642/2018) [2020] zasca 23 (25 March 2020)   [The court of Appeal] When entering into any form of a financial transaction with someone who is married in community of property, that person’s spouse’s consent may also be required for the business contract to be valid, binding and enforceable.  But what does this mean and is there a legal duty to investigate as to what the marital status of the other person is?    These questions were asked and answered in the above-mentioned two court cases. In this article I will explain what the respective Judges decided on these issues. Broodie N.O. v Maposa and Others The facts: Mrs Broodie married Mr Broodie in 1967 in community of property.  The marriage was a civil one in terms of the then Black Administration Act, 38 of 192

Maintenance: Who is legally liable to maintain who?

According to South Africa law, particularly the common law, both parents (whether in a relationship or not) are obligated to financially support their children.   While this article will only discuss the maintenance of children, it is also important to note that other parties may be legally liable to pay maintenance. In some instances, grandparents are legally liable to maintain their grandchildren if their children, that is to say the grandchildren’s parents, are unable to maintain the grandchildren. Again, this is only if the grandparents are financially able to maintain their grandchildren.   Husbands and wives are also legally liable to maintain each other whilst they are married and, if the divorce court makes an order for spousal maintenance then there will also be a legal obligation to maintain an ex-spouse after the divorce.   Lastly, children may be liable to maintain their parents. This is only if the parents can prove that they are in need of maintenance and that the child o